Still on the case of Cheif Justice Walter Onnoghen, it has been reported that a date for the final judgement has been fixed by the Code of Conduct Tribunal. CCT. More details below.
The date to deliver judgment on the six-count charge of false asset declaration brought against the former Chief Justice of Nigeria, CJN, Justice Walter Onnoghen, by the federal government has been officially set for April 18, 2019. Mr Danladi Yakubu Umar, chairman of the tribunal, announced the date of judgment after hearing legal arguments in the matter by counsels.
Danladi also stated that the rulings will be delivered on the same date in the two motions earlier filed by Onnoghen in which he challenged the jurisdiction of the tribunal and also prayed the tribunal chairman to recuse himself from the trial on account of bias. Aliyu Umar Danladi announced that judgment and ruling would be delivered simultaneously on that day at the adoption of final addresses by Onnoghen’s counsel, Okon Nkanu, SAN, and prosecution counsel.
In his adoption of his final address, Onnoghen’s counsel prayed the tribunal to dismiss the six-count charges against his client on the grounds that the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredients of the charges beyond reasonable doubt. Nkanu argued that false declaration of asset charge against Onnoghen was unknown to law because it was not clearly defined by the constitution.
He added that for the prosecution to succeed, the elements of each count in the six-count charge must be well established and in its absence, the tribunal under the law must rule in favour of the defendant. The counsel particularly faulted the claim of the prosecution that Onnoghen made partial asset declaration, adding that the claim establishes the fact that Onnoghen declared his asset and that if it was done, it raises doubts that must be resolved in favour of the defendant.
Nkanu further told the Danladi Umar-led tribunal that from the asset declaration form of Onnoghen which was admitted by the tribunal as exhibit, it was clear that the claims of Onnoghen were not verified by the CCB as required by law and, therefore, the charges against his client were based on hearsay. The defence counsel, therefore, prayed the tribunal to dismiss the entire charges, discharge and acquit Onnoghen from the alleged offences.
Aliyu Umar, the prosecution counsel then informed the tribunal that all the essential ingredients of the charges have been proved beyond all reasonable doubts and prayed the tribunal to uphold his submission.
The counsel insisted that the defendant did not declare his asset between 2005 to 2015, adding that when he did so on December 14, 2016, five bank accounts with Standard chartered bank opened between 2009 and 2011 were not declared. He, therefore, urged the tribunal to hold that the prosecution has proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.
What are your thoughts on CJN Onnoghen’s trial so far? Kindly drop your opinion in the comment section below and don’t forget to share.
ADVERTISE / PROMOTE WITH US
Feel free to contact us for music promotion or advert placement, For more inquiries